The best thing about Twitter: interaction.
The worst thing about Twitter: interaction.
Because I am on Twitter, people think that it is perfectly OK to do the virtual equivalent of spitting in my face.
Like this one dude who was catty enough to Tweet the following:
“alamak ada org naik darah, give way pls, coz kalau dia marah, people gotta “listen”.
Of course I could make merry of the fact that he Tweets like a 15-year-old girl, but that would be too easy.
The thing is I don’t always ignore my haters. While I don’t bother reading the comments on my column (I like keeping my braincells, thanks), I do take note of the @replies I get. Because sometimes my detractors do have points and I respect their freedom to disagree with my sometimes controversial/annoying opinions.
Also, sometimes it makes great fodder for my weekly column.
The way my detractor goes about it, it’s as though I scream to an audience of bound captives, forcing them to listen to me.
And the thing about my anger is, the angrier I am, the more impassioned my writing. The more I feel, the more it comes out in my words.
If I care enough to be incredibly angry about something, then it is probably worth writing about. So maybe my secret superpower is that the angrier I get, the more articulate I am.
I AM ERNA HULK. I WRITE PRETTY WHEN I’M ANGRY.
The thing is, I would like people to be decent human beings when they interact on Twitter. To be polite to people even when they disagree with them. To be angry about issues, to hate injustice and wrong instead of hating on people just because they can.
But that’s like wishing on a star, right?
So basically I’m saying, it’s cool to disagree with me. But it ain’t cool to be a dick, know what I’m saying?
Especially if you Tweet like a 15-year-old girl, bub. Unless of course, you are a 15-year-old girl. (Then Tweet all you like, sweetie! Someday you’ll grow up and learn to spell!)